In 2004, I happened to be in Dallas, Texas for a science fiction convention. Before leaving town, I decided to visit Dealey Plaza, the site of the 1963 assasination of President John F. Kennedy.
Everybody that was alive that day remembers where they were when Kennedy was shot. In 1963, I was a first-grader at Immaculate Heart of Mary Catholic School in Big Spring, Texas, sitting across the aisle from my best frend Gary. Just after lunchtime, the principal came in to tell us about the shooting, and the whole school went over to the church to pray for him. Kennedy, being a Catholic, was special to us all. When he was killed, it was a shock to the Catholic community. For Texans, there was a sense of shame that such a terrible thing could have happened on Texas soil. A little over 40 years later, I made a pilgrimage to where it all happened.
|It was a bright, chilly day in February when I arrived in Dealey Plaza.
The streets aren't blocked off; you can still drive right down Elm Street,
just like Kennedy's motorcade. Thousands of people visit every year. There
were many street vendors in the Plaza, selling books, posters and pamphlets
about JFK. There were copies of newspapers from the day of the shooting.
Lots of vendors were selling books about the "conspiracy" to kill Kennedy and the ensuing cover-up. In the decades since the shooting, the assasination has become something of a cottage industry. Writers have made careers speculating on the motives behind the shooting and hawking their pet theories. The stories of many "witnesses" kept getting better and more elaborate over the years, as people cashed in on the shooting.
|That's me in the Plaza, across Elm Street from the Grassy Knoll. Just
off my right shoulder, you can see a chalk "X" in the roadway. That's marks
Kennedy's location when he was shot.
(In fact, when I left to go home, I drove down that street, right over that X.)
To the left is the Triple Underpass bridge where some witnesses said they saw "a puff of smoke," which conspiracy theorists claim proves there was a shooter in the area. Never mind that smokeless gunpowder had been around since World War II. Never mind that there's train tracks there, and it could have easily have been steam drifting by. A conspiracy smart enough to orchestrate the assasination of a president would have thought ahead and not used anything that would pinpoint their shooter's location. A puff of smoke? What was he using, a blunderbuss?
It's shady there on the Knoll. It's logical to assume that people waiting to see the presidential motorcade passing by would have been sitting right there, maybe even right up against the fence, where any bad guys would have been seen. That's the problem with this second shooter theory. Bad guys don't like to be seen. Bad guys avoid witnesses. Bad guys planning to shoot from this location would've known the possibility of getting spotted was too great to risk. This is a terrible shooting position. Even if the shooter was hidden, the bystanders could still block his shot. An assassin planning to shoot from that location would have had no way of knowing how many people might be standing right there in the line of fire, spoiling his aim. Even if the shooter had a clear view, he'd only have a split second to take his shot as the car sped by --and any shot he took would have given away his position.
If there had been several assassins in the Plaza that day, as some writers theorize, and if the goal was to kill Kennedy, they would have all shot at him. Why not? They would not have cared who else in the car got shot, they would not have cared how many bystanders got hit in the crossfire, and they would have fired all their bullets to achieve their goal. (For example: when Egypt's Anwar Sadat was assassinated in 1981, the attackers killed him and seven people standing near him.) Dealey Plaza would've been a shooting gallery-- and that did not happen. What happened was: three shots were fired, just enough for one shooter (Oswald) to get off before the target (Kennedy) got out of range.
All of these facts add up against the idea of a conspiracy, and
instead suggest something else: the actions of a lone, pathetic, short-sighted
gunman, acting on his own. If some shadowy group wanted to kill Kennedy,
why do it in Dallas? Why not in Washington DC, or California, or while
he was giving a speech on TV? Why not poison him, or use a bomb, or make
it look like an accident? If they were all that powerful, they could have
killed him anywhere; why do it there? The answer is simple.
There was no shadowy conspiracy. Kennedy was shot in Dallas because Lee
Harvey Oswald lived in Dallas. Oswald fired from the Schoolbook Depository
building because that's where he worked. He had a rifle and knew how to
use it. Oswald was a loser who wanted to feel important, and he did it
by shooting the most important man in the country. That's opportunity,
method and motive, all you need to convict someone of murder. It's really
just as simple as that.
It's natural to resist such conclusions. When something big happens, it's hard to believe that something small --like one person-- could have accomplished it. The tendency is to imagine that big, important events are only accomplished by something equally big and important.When the Murrah Building in Oklahoma City was bombed, some wanted to believe it was caused by a secret conspiracy of right-wing militia groups... but it turned out to be a guy with a truck. After the September 11th attacks, some people wanted to believe a foreign country was behind it, and not a bunch of religious fanatics in a cave. It's easy to hold onto the idea that only institutions like governments or corporations or armies can change history...
The hard truth is that, sometimes, all that's needed to change history
is one very, very determined individual. Unfortunately.
|The idea that there was a secret government plot to kill Kennedy, kept
hidden for decades by a vast conspiracy, is absurd. I've worked in municipal
government most of my adult life, and I can testify from personal experience
that the inner workings of government are much more like the comic strip
Dilbert than The X-Files. It would take too many people to
keep a lid on things, and with that many people there's no way it could
be kept secret. (Remember: this is the same government that couldn't keep
the Stealth bomber a secret.) The threat of death doesn't stop ex-gangsters
from testifying in court, so it wouldn't stop somebody from spilling the
beans after all this time.
The whole conspiracy thing hinges on there being a second shooter on the Grassy Knoll. I don't think there was one. I honestly can't see how there could have been. The evidence shows the fatal shot came from behind and above Kennedy, right where Oswald was. The evidence doesn't show any proof of anybody else shooting at Kennedy. The argument for a conspiracy just doesn't work.
Conclusion: Oswald did it, and he did it alone. I'm sure some will disagree. I'm sure people will be arguing about this for a long time. For me, however, the mystery was solved, and the case was closed.